| From: | Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de> |
| Cc: | alex(at)neteconomist(dot)com, gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Date: | 2005-01-10 17:42:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20050110114200.76e9a51d.frank@wiles.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:33:07 +0100
Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> > Neither Oracle nor MS-SQL have the range of stored procedure
> > langauges that Postgresql supports.
>
> That is not true. Oracle uses PL/SQL for its stored procedures and
> M$-SQL does have a stored procedural language.
By "range" I believe he meant number of stored procedure languages.
He wasn't saying they didn't have a stored procedure langauge or
support, just that PostgreSQL had more languages to choose from.
---------------------------------
Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
http://www.wiles.org
---------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Turner | 2005-01-10 17:46:01 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Previous Message | Yann Michel | 2005-01-10 17:33:07 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |