From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Eric Caloone <eric(dot)caloone(at)free(dot)fr>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Warp |
Date: | 2005-01-09 21:59:20 |
Message-ID: | 200501092159.j09LxKO15796@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Eric Caloone wrote:
> >>> It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).
> >>
> >> That is pretty hard to believe, since the code we distribute contains
> >> neither shared library support nor spinlock support nor any of the
> >> other port specific tweaks for OS/2. And someone else is currently
> >> working on porting to OS/2. What's up with that?
>
> > Someone posted an 8.0rc4 binary and it is mentioned in the current FAQ,
> > so yea, I think it works.
>
> Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.
>
> As of 8.0 the spinlock support should be driven by CPU type not OS type,
> so as long as you build using a compiler that defines standard CPU
> symbols it should work. In particular I'd expect a gcc build on OS/2 to
> not have any issues about spinlocks.
>
> Shared libraries are another story --- there is no way we'd build shared
> libraries successfully without a Makefile.os2 and some additions to
> Makefile.shlib. Given the importance of plpgsql I don't think we could
> consider a build with --disable-shared to be a "supported platform".
I assume OS/2 is like our Novell port in that it doesn't compile using
our CVS source but only with modified source.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-09 22:02:33 | Re: Warp |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-09 21:15:03 | Re: Warp |