From: | Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jim Buttafuoco <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CSV arm check failure |
Date: | 2005-01-06 20:06:33 |
Message-ID: | 20050106200633.GA10780@l-t.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:05:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> writes:
> > I have not looked at pg_regress much and had not noticed the
> > 'unconditional alternative' feature. I only thought of the
> > resultmap alternative. Unconditionally adding FastFPE results
> > may even be good, so that FastFPE can pass on any platform.
>
> No, it would be bad, because on most other platforms this behavior
> is probably a bug, and altering the tests like that would mask the bug.
>
> The unconditional-acceptance thing has to be used with great caution;
> preferably only for issues that we expect on many platforms (such as
> locale dependencies).
How about the following then: let pg_regress.sh accept multiple
choices from resultmap.
--
marko
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
arm-fastfpe.diff | text/plain | 11.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-06 20:07:57 | Re: oldish libpq bug still in RC2 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-01-06 19:35:52 | Re: CSV arm check failure |