From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Subject: | Re: Standard compliant DEFAULT clause |
Date: | 2007-05-18 20:22:05 |
Message-ID: | 2005.1179519725@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> Or not, it's just a bitter and late (because of my bitterness) response
> to the rejection of my IDENTITY/GENERATED patches.
> Where's the much praised standard behaviour on standard syntax?
> So much for hypocrisy.
Hm? There's a difference between extensions and failing to comply with
what the spec says is the behavior of the syntax it provides.
I feel bad that you put so much work into what now seems to be a dead
end (at least until we can get some clarification about what the
committee really intends). But look at the bright side: you learned
quite a bit about the innards of Postgres. Hopefully your next project
will be more successful.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2007-05-19 05:05:14 | Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-05-18 20:01:06 | Re: Standard compliant DEFAULT clause |