Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one
Date: 2004-12-31 01:16:18
Message-ID: 200412310116.iBV1GIF22965@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > Version numbers don't update properly on postgres.exe when doing make
> > clean/make. It works for all other exes and dlls. I beleive this is just
> > a case of "make clean" not properly removing "win32ver.o". See attached
> > patch.
>
> Hmm, is that the only place we missed it? Might be worth diffing a make
> distclean'd tree against a virgin one.

I was under the impression we only wanted a new version number with a
configure run, however, I can see that "make clean" perhaps should do it
too.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-12-31 03:57:26 Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one is easy)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-31 01:14:39 Re: [HACKERS] Bgwriter behavior