Re: Multiple foreign keys on same field

From: Ciprian Popovici <ciprian(at)zuavra(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multiple foreign keys on same field
Date: 2004-12-15 22:15:40
Message-ID: 20041216001540.18620f55@xxx
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:00:45 -0700 Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> wrote:
> Do you mean that you don't need foreign key constraints to enforce
> referential integrity, but only to cascade changes to another table?
> If so, have you considered using triggers instead? Or have I
> misunderstood what you're trying to do?

No, you understood right. Yes, I will have to go with triggers instead.
Thanks for the input.

--
Ciprian Popovici

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2004-12-15 22:29:17 Re: UNION with more restrictive DISTINCT
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-12-15 21:54:52 Re: is there a repair utility for postgresql?