From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Mention aix cc_r is not supported, and why |
Date: | 2004-12-14 13:10:54 |
Message-ID: | 200412141310.iBEDAsj18306@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2004 13:58 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > Mention aix cc_r is not supported, and why
>
> I think this change is inappropriate. First, cc_r is no more or less common
> than cc; you have to purchase either one. Second, cc_r is supported. We
> have one port report that uses it. I say we just leave it alone and wait for
> people to fix the thread support.
>
Did you look at the patch? To support it would require us to use a
special CC setting for all cases where we are linking to a threaded
libpq. I don't think we want to add that ugliness to our code just to
support it, just like we didn't do a similar change to support threading
on unixware.
If we wanted to support it we could easily do so by using PTHREAD_CC in
all the bin makefiles and other places that link to libpq.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-12-14 14:01:47 | Re: pgsql: Mention aix cc_r is not supported, and why |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-12-14 13:02:34 | Re: pgsql: Mention aix cc_r is not supported, and why |