| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Bryan Roberts <bryan(at)aotea(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address' |
| Date: | 2004-12-13 18:40:14 |
| Message-ID: | 200412131840.iBDIeE701624@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Added to TODO for Win32:
> > o Allow the shared memory address to be configured via GUC
> > This is something we knew might be required and now I think it is
> > required. Using a fixed address was always pretty crazy.
>
> I see no proof of that at all in this bug report. The postmaster has
> evidently managed to create the segment, so the address per se is not
> the problem.
Really? You do realize we just choose a fixed address on Win32, right?
I will remove the item and see how it plays out though.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-13 18:51:30 | Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address' |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-13 18:33:11 | Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address' |