From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: When to encrypt |
Date: | 2004-12-06 22:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 20041206221548.GB27004@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:07:25PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> By contrast, encryption is useful for non-live data such as database backups.
> This lets you take them off-site and store them someplace without worrying
> about someone walking off with your entire database. Or to discard the tapes
> without worrying about someone reading your old data from the discarded tapes.
> (Assuming of course that you don't write the key on the label...)
Actually, hard disk encryption is useful for one thing: so if somebody
kills the power and takes the hard disk/computer, the data is safe.
While it's running it's vulnerable though...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-06 22:19:48 | Re: DBD::PgSPI 0.02 |
Previous Message | Per Jensen | 2004-12-06 21:24:26 | Re: Index scan vs. Seq scan on timestamps |