Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
Date: 2004-12-06 21:00:30
Message-ID: 20041206210030.GJ22712@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:06:57PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Amen, brother! That would never be tolerated in any commercial setting
> that I am aware of, and should not be here either, IMNSHO. Silence does

I don't know what commercial settings you're familiar with, but I can
think of some where it _would_ be tolerated. That toleration,
however, certainly explains a number of really crappy pieces of
software I've had to work with.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are
against all taxes for raising money to pay it off.
--Alexander Hamilton

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2004-12-06 21:05:58 Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-12-06 20:59:47 Re: DBD::PgSPI 0.02