| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not? |
| Date: | 2004-12-06 00:42:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20041205204132.W9789@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> As for suggestions, elsewhere you wrote:
>
> "Now, if I don't understand the patch, we can change the procedure so I
> require someone to state it is OK rather than the fallback of quiet
> acceptance, especially just before a beta or RC version."
I believe that this was the direction Tom and I were looking at as well
...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-12-06 01:04:03 | Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not? |
| Previous Message | elein | 2004-12-06 00:18:49 | Re: rules, triggers and views |