From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Henry Molina <henrymolina(at)cmn-consulting(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Trigger problem |
Date: | 2004-12-05 05:36:20 |
Message-ID: | 20041205053620.GA42784@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:53:46PM -0500, Henry Molina wrote:
> drop table t1;
> drop table t2;
> create table t1 (id integer);
> create table t2 (id integer);
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION myfunc() RETURNS trigger AS '
> BEGIN
> insert into t2 values(NEW.id);
> END;
> ' LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>
> CREATE TRIGGER
> mytri
> AFTER INSERT ON t1 FOR EACH STATEMENT
> EXECUTE PROCEDURE myfunc();
> insert into t1 values(1);
>
> and I get:
>
> ERROR: record "new" is not assigned yet
> DETAIL: The tuple structure of a not-yet-assigned record is
> indeterminate.
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "myfunc" line 2 at SQL statement
If you want to access NEW then declare your trigger to be FOR EACH
ROW. Statement-level triggers set NEW to NULL because the trigger
fires not for a particular row, but for the entire statement, which
could affect multiple rows.
Also, your trigger function doesn't return a value. Even though
AFTER triggers ignore the return value, the function must still
return something. The documentation recommends returning NULL
when the value will be ignored.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-12-05 05:44:17 | Re: Trigger problem |
Previous Message | Henry Molina | 2004-12-05 04:53:46 | Trigger problem |