| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not? |
| Date: | 2004-12-04 19:04:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200412041904.iB4J4s609728@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > As far as the patch itself, I don't think I ever claimed it was ready
> > for prime time --- rather, I followed process and it was applied.
>
> Applying it on the day before we go RC is claiming that it is ready for
> prime time. As Jan already told you, the "process" may include applying
> patches by default during devel cycle, but it can't work that way in
> late beta.
OK, so what do we want the process to be?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-12-04 19:57:35 | Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-04 18:46:36 | Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not? |