Re: somebody working on: Prevent default re-use of sysids

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, schmidtm <schmidtm(at)mock-software(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: somebody working on: Prevent default re-use of sysids
Date: 2004-12-04 03:37:32
Message-ID: 200412040337.iB43bWj14694@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > What about Alvaro's shared dependencies work:
> > >
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-10/msg00963.php
> >
> > That is for allowing comments on global tables like pg_shadow and
> > pg_database. I don't think it relates to finding if someone owns
> > objects in another database.
> >
>
> I quote from the first paragraph of the given link:
>
> I'm currently playing with implementing a "shared dependency" catalog,
> to keep track of objects pointing to global objects, currently users and
> tablespaces. So it is forbidden to drop a user that owns tables (or
> whatever objects) on other databases.

Interesting. I didn't realize he was doing dependency between global
and db-local objects.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-12-04 04:00:23 Re: 8.0RC1 tomorrow
Previous Message lsunley 2004-12-04 03:31:48 Re: So is there a 8.0RC1 tomorrow