Re: pgFoundary?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgFoundary?
Date: 2004-12-03 18:58:37
Message-ID: 20041203145806.O87096@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> I've seen references to pgFoundary on the mailling lists, but I can't
> seem to find it anywhere. Does it actually exist? Is it the predecessor
> to gborg?
>
> Speaking of gborg, how come it isn't accepting projects right now?

because pgfoundry is meant to replace gborg ... so any new projects should
be added there. Our 'long term goal' is to move projects from gborg ->
pgfoundry ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-12-03 18:59:22 Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was:
Previous Message Alec Swan 2004-12-03 18:53:57 Re: table inheritance and DB design