From: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"? |
Date: | 2004-12-03 19:18:43 |
Message-ID: | 200412031418.43416.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On December 3, 2004 02:15 pm, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So the developers of phpPgAdmin don't count? And JDBC? And Slony? and
> PostGIS? and eRServer? Do I make my point here? How does is benefit
> PostgreSQL to exclude so many?
>
> Given that over the next few years we can expect to put an increasing
> amount of code into "add-ins" and less and less code into the core, I think
> not listing optional add-in contributors would be very short-sighted.
> *especially* since it's Core, NOT the contributors, who gets to decide
> what's in the main code and what's not.
Maybe we should acknowledge corporate contribution period. The challenge is to
arrive at a standard that everyone can agree.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-12-03 19:20:49 | Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-12-03 19:17:47 | Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"? |