| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ready for RC1 |
| Date: | 2004-12-03 00:56:34 |
| Message-ID: | 200412030056.iB30uY729414@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go
> > >> for RC1.
> > >
> > > Considering that you just added at least three new and completely
> > > untested features, I don't think RC1 is the way to go.
> >
> > I have to agree here ... I'd do a beta6 tomorrow, but "Open Items for 8.0"
> > means we aren't ready for a "Release Candidate" ...
>
> True, I was going to just move them to TODO and push on but there has
> been on agreement that is the way to go for the open items.
One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will
continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically
saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we perhaps can keep
fixes for 8.0.1.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-12-03 01:02:36 | Re: Ready for RC1 |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-12-03 00:50:43 | Re: 8.0RC1 tomorrow |