From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
Date: | 2004-12-02 21:07:09 |
Message-ID: | 20041202170613.W46440@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, elein wrote:
> General Bits is my way of contributing back to the community.
> It is a FREE service. It contains articles and examples
> about PostgreSQL only. It has about two years worth of weekly
> issues containing one to six articles in each issue. All
> old issues are available and where possible translation has
> been done into Castellano and Portuguese.
>
> Subscriptions (donations) can be made to help offset my time.
> You get a few perks with that. But honestly, only a handful of
> people subscribe. If I were making money on this I think my
> request would be unreasonable. But I'm not. I'll talk numbers
> with anyone nosy enough to ask :-)
>
> Most people who go to General Bits never go to my main web
> site. The link is always published directly to the latest
> column. (In the spirit of sunshine, General Bits is on
> vacation until January however.)
>
> Because the intent of the site is to give back to the community
> and because it has been achieving that goal I politely disagree
> with Robert Treat's interpretation of GB as something not part
> of the community as a whole.
Have to say that I'd agree, based on the above ... I know I've used it at
least once when doing research on the whole FSM stuff ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-12-02 21:12:10 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-12-02 20:48:31 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-12-02 21:12:10 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-12-02 20:48:31 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |