| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
| Date: | 2004-12-02 17:18:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200412020918.22719.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Marc, Robert,
> > > Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should
> > > be some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a
> > > contribution, it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ...
Well, the main reason I wanted the 3-year limit is that I don't want to try to
research what companies contributed code in 1989. I expect that we'll be
pretty casual about taking companies "off for expiration" -- if we ever do.
> > I think Marc has an interesting point. The other issue is what about
> > companies who may not sponsor a ton of code but troll the mailing lists?
No. Why would we care? Unless you have a different meaning for "troll" than
I do?
> > Or provide major services like hosting?
Yes.
> > Or secondary code like the .Net
> > provider?
Yes, *especially* these.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-12-02 17:24:53 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-12-02 17:10:12 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-12-02 17:24:53 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-12-02 17:10:12 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |