| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Thomas F(dot)O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM FULL FREEZE is unsafe |
| Date: | 2004-12-02 04:46:00 |
| Message-ID: | 200412020446.iB24k0q07949@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Thomas F.O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> writes:
> > So why not have VACUUM FULL FREEZE just do what you propose: VACUUM
> > FULL then VACUUM FREEZE.
>
> The objective is to make it more safe, not less so. Doing that would
> require rewriting a whole bunch of code, which I am not up for at this
> stage of the release cycle.
Has this been corrected/disallowed yet?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-12-02 04:55:43 | Re: lwlocks and starvation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-02 04:40:28 | Re: Postresql 8.0 Beta 3 - SELECT ... FOR UPDATE |