Re: Increasing the length of

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Parker <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Increasing the length of
Date: 2004-12-01 16:17:52
Message-ID: 200412011617.iB1GHqD03101@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 19:32, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > David Parker wrote:
> > > I've been using "log_min_duration_statement = 0" to get durations on all
> > > SQL statements for the purposes of performance tuning, because this logs
> > > the duration on the same line as the statement. My reading of this TODO
> > > is that now log_min_duration_statement = 0 would give me the statements
> > > but no total duration?
> >
> > Oh, sorry, you are right. I forgot about the duration part! I got so
> > excited I forgot.
> >
> > TODO item removed.
>
> David's objection was noted, and why I hadn't coded it (yet).
>
> There are currently two ways of getting statement and duration output,
> which is confusing....
>
> You can either
> 1. Individual statements
> - log_statement = all
> - log_duration = true
> - log_line_prefix includes processid
>
> which produces 2 log lines like
> statement: xxxxxxxxx
> duration: yyyyyyyyyy
>
> 2. log_min_duration
> log_min_duration_statement=0
> which produces 1 log line like
> duration: yyyyyyy statement: xxxxxxxxxx
>
> These two things do exactly the same thing, apart from the way the
> output is presented to the user in the log line.
>
> I'd like to change log_min_duration_statement as suggested, but this
> side-effect behaviour of being a better log_statement than log_statement
> kindof gets in the way. It makes me wonder why we have log_statement at
> all.

We have it so you can look in the log to see currently running queries
rather than just completed queries.

> We all want to do performance tracing. I'd also like to be able to
> dynamically monitor what is actually happening *now* on the system.
> There is no way right now to monitor for rogue queries, other than to
> cancel anything that runs more than statement_timeout. Thats not good
> either, even if it does keep the current behaviour.
>
> My preference would be to do the following:
> - add a script to contrib to process the log file
> - always add processid to log_statement_prefix when both log_statement
> and log_duration are specified, so you can always tie up the data

I think our setup is confusing enough. Adding "automatic" additions
seems even more confusing than what we have now. We could throw a log
warning message somehow though.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cason, Kenny 2004-12-01 16:28:40 Where is the connection info
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-12-01 16:05:15 Re: Error handling in plperl and pltcl