Re: Benchmark-Comparison PostGreSQL vs. SQL Server

From: Shridhar Daithankar <ghodechhap(at)ghodechhap(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Benchmark-Comparison PostGreSQL vs. SQL Server
Date: 2004-11-25 13:06:06
Message-ID: 200411251836.07053.ghodechhap@ghodechhap.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday 25 Nov 2004 6:22 pm, Richard Huxton wrote:

> > On the other hand, if an application has to "fight" against the file
> > system, I would suppose it to increase RAM and CPU usage
> > significantly.
>
> It shouldn't be fighting the file system, but it does use it, and rely
> on it for caching (rather than bypassing your filesystem cache). For
> MS-SQL server I'm guessing you're allocating a lot of memory to SQL
> server and not much to the file-cache. For PG you'll want it the other
> way around.

Do we have some sort of document about how caching on windows works? It is
very simple on linux and BSDs but for other OSs, I haven't seen many
suggestions.

I am sure OS specific hints would help OP a lot.

Shridhar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Martini 2004-11-25 13:10:03 Re: why use SCHEMA? any real-world examples?
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2004-11-25 12:54:46 Re: Trigger before insert