| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Beta5 now Available |
| Date: | 2004-11-24 03:03:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20041124030300.GA29827@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 08:43:56PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>
> >Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> >>...so the very first client is the real server that must be run
> >>24/24.
> >>
> >I don't think this is correct. You need a tracker for downloaders
> >to be able to find each other but no client is more important than
> >the others.
>
> can there be multiple trackers? for instance, if we ran
> bt.postgresql.org on two different servers, could they both run
> trackers at the same time?
I suspect the best thing would be to run the tracker on one server
(bt) and seeders elsewhere.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-11-24 04:07:11 | Re: Plperl Safe version check fails for Safe 2.09 |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2004-11-24 02:58:49 | Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status |