Re: Beta5 now Available

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Beta5 now Available
Date: 2004-11-23 17:16:01
Message-ID: 20041123171601.GM10437@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Marc G. Fournier (scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org) wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >The download servers have enough bandwidth to serve any client faster than
> >the client can take. The traffic on the download servers is not reduced,
> >only distributed differently. I don't see any advantage.
>
> Actually, and here is where I exhibit my total lack of knowledge of BT
> internals ... my understanding was that each 'client' becomes a 'server'
> by the fact that they have it on their machine and running ... so, over
> time, the amount of load on the central server would decrease, since new
> downloads would come from closer "client machines" ... essentially, a
> whole new set of "unofficial mirror sites" for the source code ...
>
> Is this a wrong understanding?

Nope, that's about right, from what I understand. Not only that, but
for far-flung people (from the server) it's possible that there are
links between the server and the client that are too slow, bt could
reduce the bandwidth demands on those links too if other people on the
far side are also grabbing the stream.

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2004-11-23 17:46:53 Re: Beta5 now Available
Previous Message Jeff Hoffmann 2004-11-23 17:06:40 Re: Beta5 now Available