From: | "Net Virtual Mailing Lists" <mailinglists(at)net-virtual(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Join between databases or (???) |
Date: | 2004-11-21 02:37:12 |
Message-ID: | 20041121023712.31576@mail.net-virtual.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I suspect that schemas are the best way to go, but gosh is it going to be
a bear to re-engineer all this stuff... Unfortunately it was all done in
the "pre-schema" days of Postgres and just evolved from there.....
If I want to take an existing table and add it into a schema is it
basically "alter database [database] rename [table] to schema.[table]"?....
.. I guess that I was just looking for confirmation there was not
something in postgres which would allow this "full featured cross-
database join" before pulling an a few all nighters...
Thanks!
- Greg
>On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 06:09:49PM -0700, Net Virtual Mailing Lists wrote:
>
>> I have situation where multiple databases need to use data from a common
>> source and it would consume way too much disk space to reproduce this
>> data into the many databases which require it. Is there some way to do a
>> join between databases or some other way of making the data in one
>> database available in another in a space-efficient manner? Of course it
>> is necessary that if this is possible any queries need to take advantage
>> of indexes/etc.
>
>You could use dblink but it might not provide all the functionality
>you're looking for. Could the multiple databases possibly be converted
>into multiple schemas in the same database?
>
>--
>Michael Fuhr
>http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2004-11-21 03:03:39 | Re: Join between databases or (???) |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2004-11-21 02:13:46 | Re: Problem Downloading for FreeBSD |