Re: invalid page header

From: G u i d o B a r o s i o <gbarosio(at)uolsinectis(dot)com(dot)ar>
To: bruno(at)wolff(dot)to, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: invalid page header
Date: 2004-11-18 20:44:44
Message-ID: 20041118204444.C61356C9F7@tino.sinectis.com.ar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks all for the quick reply.

Cheers, Regards, and muchas gracias!!

Guido.

> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:45:53 -0500,
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > G u i d o B a r o s i o <gbarosio(at)uolsinectis(dot)com(dot)ar> writes:
> > > I am worry about a hardware problem.
> >
> > I think you're right. badblocks (for disk) and memtest86 (for RAM)
> > are the tools I've seen recommended most often for narrowing down
> > what's gone flaky.
>
> smartmontools can also be useful for checking disks. Doing regular
> selftests will be less resource intensive then doing read checks
> with badblocks.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-11-18 21:07:15 Test database for new installs?
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2004-11-18 20:40:11 Re: Trouble with plpgsql on 7.4.6