| From: | Jonathan Daugherty <cygnus(at)cprogrammer(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: User-defined types |
| Date: | 2004-11-17 19:10:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20041117191024.GB32204@vulcan.cprogrammer.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
# > "Whenever a user-defined base data type is created, PostgreSQL
# > automatically creates an associated array type, whose name consists
# > of the base type's name prepended with an underscore.
#
# The key word in that sentence is "base" data type --- ie, not
# composite.
Ah, I see -- it wasn't obvious to me.
# We don't currently support arrays of composite types. (Nor arrays
# of domain types, either, IIRC.)
Ok, thanks for your time.
--
Jonathan Daugherty
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication & Support Services, (503) 667-4564
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Harry Smith | 2004-11-18 02:30:17 | PROPOSAL: Usenet Discussion Repost |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-17 19:09:51 | Re: User-defined types |