From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Riccardo G(dot) Facchini" <abief_ag_-postgresql(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: session_id |
Date: | 2004-11-17 15:19:39 |
Message-ID: | 20041117151939.GA4078@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 06:25:25AM -0800, Riccardo G. Facchini wrote:
>
> --- Richard Huxton <__> wrote:
> >
> > Add a new sequence to your database:
[snip]
> Good idea, but it won't work for what I need.
> I'll be able to do get the nextval('my_session_id') as soon as the
> session initiates, but my problem is that I need to make all the
> subsecuent actions aware of that particular value. using
> currval('my_session_id') is not good, as any other session is likely to
> also change my_session_id to another value.
Where did you get the idea that currval() would be affected by other
sessions? Richard mentioned that sequences are concurrency-safe,
as does the documentation.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/functions-sequence.html
Can you give us an example of where this wouldn't work?
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-11-17 15:24:23 | Re: session_id |
Previous Message | Riccardo G. Facchini | 2004-11-17 15:04:26 | Re: session_id |