| From: | Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: OID's |
| Date: | 2004-11-16 09:43:00 |
| Message-ID: | 200411162043.00195.mr-russ@pws.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:01 pm, Joolz wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann zei:
> >
> > OIDS are a system level implementation. They are no longer required
> > (you can make tables without OIDS) and they may go away someday.
>
> Out of curiosiry: how will we handle blobs once the OID's are gone?
>
I would guess bytea would become the standard for blob use. The size
is limited to about 1G compressed, but I would guess most people don't
store 2G files in there DB at the moment, or have that much ram to be
able to handle a value that big.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2004-11-16 09:52:40 | Re: OID's |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-11-16 09:42:36 | Re: OID's |