Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ?

From: Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ?
Date: 2004-11-16 14:55:58
Message-ID: 200411161555.59144.herve@elma.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

I'm completly dispointed with Tsearch2 ...

I have a table like this :
Table "public.site"
Column | Type |
Modifiers
---------------+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
id_site | integer | not null default
nextval('public.site_id_site_seq'::text)
site_name | text |
site_url | text |
url | text |
language | text |
datecrea | date | default now()
id_category | integer |
time_refresh | integer |
active | integer |
error | integer |
description | text |
version | text |
idx_site_name | tsvector |
lastcheck | date |
lastupdate | timestamp without time zone |
Indexes:
"site_id_site_key" unique, btree (id_site)
"ix_idx_site_name" gist (idx_site_name)
Triggers:
tsvectorupdate_site_name BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON site FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE tsearch2('idx_site_name', 'site_name')

I have 183 956 records in the database ...

SELECT s.site_name, s.id_site, s.description, s.site_url,
case when exists (select id_user
from user_choice u
where u.id_site=s.id_site
and u.id_user = 1) then 1
else 0 end as bookmarked
FROM site s
WHERE s.idx_site_name @@ to_tsquery('atari');

Explain Analyze :
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using ix_idx_site_name on site s (cost=0.00..1202.12 rows=184
width=158) (actual time=4687.674..4698.422 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (idx_site_name @@ '\'atari\''::tsquery)
Filter: (idx_site_name @@ '\'atari\''::tsquery)
SubPlan
-> Seq Scan on user_choice u (cost=0.00..3.46 rows=1 width=4) (actual
time=0.232..0.232 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: ((id_site = $0) AND (id_user = 1))
Total runtime: 4698.608 ms

First time I run the request I have a result in about 28 seconds.

SELECT s.site_name, s.id_site, s.description, s.site_url,
case when exists (select id_user
from user_choice u
where u.id_site=s.id_site
and u.id_user = 1) then 1
else 0 end as bookmarked
FROM site_rss s
WHERE s.site_name ilike '%atari%'

QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on site_rss s (cost=0.00..11863.16 rows=295 width=158) (actual
time=17.414..791.937 rows=12 loops=1)
Filter: (site_name ~~* '%atari%'::text)
SubPlan
-> Seq Scan on user_choice u (cost=0.00..3.46 rows=1 width=4) (actual
time=0.222..0.222 rows=0 loops=12)
Filter: ((id_site = $0) AND (id_user = 1))
Total runtime: 792.099 ms

First time I run the request I have a result in about 789 miliseconds !!???

I'm using PostgreSQL v7.4.6 with a Bi-Penitum III 933 Mhz and 1 Gb of RAM.

Any idea ... ? For the moment I'm going back to use the ilike solution ... but
I was really thinking that Tsearch2 could be a better solution ...

Regards,
--
Hervé Piedvache

Elma Ingénierie Informatique
6 rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré
F-75008 - Paris - France
Pho. 33-144949901
Fax. 33-144949902

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2004-11-16 15:32:57 Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ?
Previous Message F. Senault 2004-11-16 10:55:59 Re: mis-estimation on data-warehouse aggregate creation