From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | jing han <jing_han_66(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: about libpq-C FETCH ALL performance issue |
Date: | 2004-11-15 14:24:52 |
Message-ID: | 20041115142452.GF90696@xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 05:55:01AM -0800, jing han wrote:
> and then res = PQexec(conn, "FETCH ALL in myportal");
>
> to get the data.
>
> I found when our database has more and more data, res
> = PQexec(conn, "FETCH ALL in myportal"); cost more and
> more time, much more than
If you use just the FETCH ALL, why are you using a cursor in the first
place?
> Then I try FETCH 1 instead of FETCH ALL, no
> improvement.
Are you doing just one FETCH 1 to obtain a single row, or are you
doing the FETCH 1 in a loop so you get all rows? The latter would
be extremely slow in any case... Try fetching smaller blocks, like
maybe 100 rows at a time, and see if that helps.
> I wonder if there is other faster way ( I mean other
> than FETCH ALL command) to get data from database with
> libpq-C, or If you have a patch to make FETCH work
> faster or new release to work better?
Just do a normal "SELECT" without the cursor. This will give you
all the data at once, just like a FETCH ALL.
Jeroen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | L J Bayuk | 2004-11-16 01:36:49 | Re: Where is src/interfaces/libpgtcl? |
Previous Message | jing han | 2004-11-15 13:55:01 | about libpq-C FETCH ALL performance issue |