Re: A modest proposal: get rid of GUC's USERLIMIT

Andrew McMillan wrote:
> > > That sounds excellent - I hadn't realised that this workaround would be
> > > possible, and indeed with this in place that will provide even better
> > > control over the facility.
> >
> > OK, here is one vote for the ALTER USER/remove USERLIMIT croud, and you
> > were the person who originally mentioned the problem. You don't think
> > the function creation is hard. Perhaps that's the way to go then.
>
> Yes, I agree - it seems good.
>
> Also, I don't see that this function would need to be "written under
> stress" as ISTR you suggested elsewhere - any analysis like this is
> going to be following on from review of other statistics - I think it
> would normally be a well-planned process.

OK, Tom please go ahead with the patch.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073