From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design |
Date: | 2004-11-12 18:00:40 |
Message-ID: | 200411121800.iACI0em19239@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Is the new website going to be rolled out in time for the 8.0 release,
which could be in the next few weeks?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Omar,
>
> > We believe that it is clean, professional and simple. And it makes the
> > release of 8.0 actually... exciting. :)
>
> I like the organization of content. I find the graphics a bit HP-ish, but
> that's work-on-able. It's certainly less crowded than our current design,
> and you've done a nice job making things a lot more intuitively findable.
>
> > It is a *drop-in* replacement for the current pgweb design. No
> > additional work is required to retrofit the current wwwdevel design.
> > It's already done!
>
> Keen, this makes a discussion about it more useful. Thank you for going the
> extra mile and dealing with some of the drill-down pages; it really gives us
> an idea of how you envision the site being organized.
>
> > We've gone through a bit of the current content and fixed it up with
> > proper headings and so forth. But we believe that the content needs to
> > be restructured to fit within navigational guide lines.
>
> No arguments here ... see the collected archives of www.
>
> > * The overuse of subdomains is a major pain. Each subdomain uses a
> > completely different layout and design. X.postgresql.org should be under
> > the relevant section on the main site. Advocacy should move under
> > /about/. Developers has it's own section. Tech docs should move under
> > Documentation, etc.
>
> We've had a consolidation plan for over a year. Really, you should engage
> more of a dialoge in the WWW list and talk to us about what's already
> planned.
>
> Techdocs is one hitch; article generation/editing needs to be handled by some
> kind of online text editor. Otherwise we limit contributors to the current
> WWW team and nothing gets written.
>
> Of course, it would also be a really good idea to have any part of the site
> requiring significant maintenance .... such as the list of GUIs, the
> contributor list, or consulting companies ... to be editable via simple text
> editor or html form instead of via raw XHTML. This would allow the general
> pool of documentation volunteers -- which is 5x large than WWW volunteers --
> to maintain these areas.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-11-12 19:40:47 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-11-12 17:19:26 | Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2004-11-12 18:37:54 | Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-11-12 17:19:26 | Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design |