Re: ALTER USER SET log_* not allowed...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew McMillan <andrew(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PGBugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER USER SET log_* not allowed...
Date: 2004-11-11 02:24:59
Message-ID: 200411110224.iAB2OxB20338@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > As much as I would like the URERLIMIT hacks removed for 8.0 I am thinking
> > we are too far along in release and don't have enough time to figure out
> > how to do the security definer function cleanly.
>
> What does that have to do with it? We aren't the ones who would be
> writing such a function.

I am thinking it is too much to remove such functionality and require
others to write it. They will not write it until they are debugging
something, and then they will not have time to do it. I think we need
to provide such functionality in a cleaner way than just saying "write a
function". I think it needs more thought and we don't have the time.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PostgreSQL Bugs List 2004-11-11 05:31:58 BUG #1312: the ordinal 2821 could not be located
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-11 00:26:36 Re: data corruption?