Re: Increasing the length of

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Increasing the length of
Date: 2004-11-10 22:51:01
Message-ID: 20041110225101.GA24990@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:52:17PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 21:48, Richard Huxton wrote:
> >
> > Isn't that:
> > log_min_duration_statement (integer)
>
> That gets written when a statement completes, not during execution.

I've been following this thread, and I was thinking the same thing.
I wonder how much work it'd be to have another log setting -- say
log_statement_after_min_duration (integer) -- which did what Simon
wants. That'd more than satisfy my need, for sure. Might the cost
of that be too high, though?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir?
--attr. John Maynard Keynes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2004-11-10 22:57:40 Re: Increasing the length of
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-11-10 22:48:49 MAX/MIN optimization via rewrite (plus query rewrites generally)