| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Increasing the length of |
| Date: | 2004-11-10 22:51:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20041110225101.GA24990@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:52:17PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 21:48, Richard Huxton wrote:
> >
> > Isn't that:
> > log_min_duration_statement (integer)
>
> That gets written when a statement completes, not during execution.
I've been following this thread, and I was thinking the same thing.
I wonder how much work it'd be to have another log setting -- say
log_statement_after_min_duration (integer) -- which did what Simon
wants. That'd more than satisfy my need, for sure. Might the cost
of that be too high, though?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir?
--attr. John Maynard Keynes
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2004-11-10 22:57:40 | Re: Increasing the length of |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-11-10 22:48:49 | MAX/MIN optimization via rewrite (plus query rewrites generally) |