From: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
Date: | 2004-11-09 16:08:03 |
Message-ID: | 200411091108.03413.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
At the risk of making dire enemies I vote for SLONY :-)
On November 9, 2004 10:47 am, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've just been contacted by ZDnet again for a few more details relating
> to a story they are about to run (today!...) about PostgreSQL reference
> sites. They have quotes from a number of them.... one of which is, I
> believe, the Oxford University Computing Centre.
>
> I have been asked about why there is no single preferred Replication
> Solution etc...; I said it was the nature of the development community
> that many ideas are allowed out at once.
>
> Many people ask this, so let's chew it out now ahead of the 8.0
> release... I've got better things to do too, but I keep getting asked,
> so I want to have a full steer... we probably need a press FAQ for the
> release: this is No.1
>
> "So which one would you choose?" My personal answer was that IMHO Slony
> seems to have the most community support and is the one I would choose
> to use.
>
> Flame on...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2004-11-09 16:22:46 | Re: Final Copy Edit: Press Release, Page |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-11-09 15:47:48 | PostgreSQL in the press again |