From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ext3 journalling type |
Date: | 2004-11-08 14:04:45 |
Message-ID: | 200411081404.iA8E4jK27330@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> The ext3fs allows to selet type of journalling to be used with
> filesystem. Journalling pretty much "mirrors" the work of WAL
> logging by PostgreSQL... I wonder which type of journalling
> is best for PgSQL in terms of performance.
> Choices include:
> journal
> All data is committed into the journal prior to being
> written into the main file system.
> ordered
> This is the default mode. All data is forced directly
> out to the main file system prior to its metadata being
> committed to the journal.
> writeback
> Data ordering is not preserved - data may be written into
> the main file system after its metadata has been commit-
> ted to the journal. This is rumoured to be the highest-
> throughput option. It guarantees internal file system
> integrity, however it can allow old data to appear in
> files after a crash and journal recovery.
>
> Am I right to assume that "writeback" is both fastest and at the same
> time as safe to use as ordered? Maybe any of you did some benchmarks?
Yes. I have seen benchmarks that say writeback is fastest but I don't
have any numbers handy.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matt Clark | 2004-11-08 15:14:04 | Re: ext3 journalling type |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-11-08 13:20:11 | Re: postgresql amd-64 |