Re: ext3 journalling type

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ext3 journalling type
Date: 2004-11-08 14:04:45
Message-ID: 200411081404.iA8E4jK27330@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> The ext3fs allows to selet type of journalling to be used with
> filesystem. Journalling pretty much "mirrors" the work of WAL
> logging by PostgreSQL... I wonder which type of journalling
> is best for PgSQL in terms of performance.
> Choices include:
> journal
> All data is committed into the journal prior to being
> written into the main file system.
> ordered
> This is the default mode. All data is forced directly
> out to the main file system prior to its metadata being
> committed to the journal.
> writeback
> Data ordering is not preserved - data may be written into
> the main file system after its metadata has been commit-
> ted to the journal. This is rumoured to be the highest-
> throughput option. It guarantees internal file system
> integrity, however it can allow old data to appear in
> files after a crash and journal recovery.
>
> Am I right to assume that "writeback" is both fastest and at the same
> time as safe to use as ordered? Maybe any of you did some benchmarks?

Yes. I have seen benchmarks that say writeback is fastest but I don't
have any numbers handy.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Clark 2004-11-08 15:14:04 Re: ext3 journalling type
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2004-11-08 13:20:11 Re: postgresql amd-64