| From: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce |
| Date: | 2004-11-07 11:15:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20041107111528.GA30964@mcknight.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 07:17:29PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Once you have brought up a database in timeline N+1, you can't use it as
> > > the base to recover to a point in timeline N because the data file
> > > contents cannot be trusted to be identical to the way they were in
> > > timeline N.
> > You mean "in timeline N ... to a point in timeline N+1", don't you?
> Specifically not. The point is: you can't go back in time. Recovery is a
> rollforward operation, so you must start at an earlier point and
> rollforwards from there.
Ok, that seems to be pretty intuitive. But could one extend the recovery
mechanism such that one can go from PIT t_0 to PIT t_1 with t_1 > t_0
without re-restoring the original backup?
Joachim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-11-07 11:36:17 | Re: [PATCHES] pgxs under Win32 for PL/Java |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-11-07 10:50:59 | Re: pgxs under Win32 for PL/Java |