From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches |
Date: | 2004-11-05 05:10:25 |
Message-ID: | 200411050510.iA55APU25347@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
> > period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and
> > found 37 messages that need review:
> > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
> > I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1.
>
> AFAICS all of those were rejected, applied in some later form, or just
> work-in-progress that never got completed. I don't think you need to
> hold onto any of them; I certainly don't see any that look ready to apply.
Just confirming that we don't need to keep those emails that talk about:
index correlation
binary copy tools
updatable cursors
hold cursors
datacube patch
plpq for dblink
langinfo for languages-specific to_char(date)
libpq support for precision/scale
packages support
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2004-11-05 10:49:31 | use of IDE's an tools |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-11-05 02:24:19 | fsm_ variables ... |