Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Date: 2004-11-05 02:19:12
Message-ID: 20041104221815.I21566@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

>> I'm not sure if I like this one too much ... but it would be nice if
>> something like this triggered a warning in the logs, maybe a feature of
>> pg_autovacuum itself?
>
> autovacuum would probably be a reasonable place to put it. We don't
> currently have any good way for autovacuum to get at the information,
> but I suppose that an integrated autovacuum daemon could do so.

You had mentioned doing the select on pg_class for the relations variable
... pg_autovacuum could just as easily do that as part of its start up
routine, no? when it 'loads' all the table information?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kronuz ! 2004-11-05 02:21:28 New ISBN/ISSN/ISMN/EAN13 module.
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-11-05 01:57:34 Re: CVS should die

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-11-05 12:00:56 Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2004-11-04 23:09:05 Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...