Re: charset/collation in values

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: charset/collation in values
Date: 2004-11-02 15:36:00
Message-ID: 200411021636.00552.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Dienstag, 2. November 2004 13:15 schrieb Dennis Bjorklund:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > A collation implies a character set, so you only need to store one piece
> > of information anyway.
>
> No, a collation implies a character repertoire like UCS (unicode), it can
> apply to several character sets like UTF8 and UTF16.

For the theoretical specification of a collation, it might suffice to know the
character repertoire. But I think in practice, the implementation of a
collation will require knowing the specific character encoding.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-11-02 15:36:38 Re: charset/collation in values
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-11-02 14:49:11 Re: tablespaces for temporary files