From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Array function |
Date: | 2004-11-01 05:21:17 |
Message-ID: | 20041101052117.GI13884@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 10:40:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > Here's a little addition to the array functions & operators section of
> > the manual. It adds a function array() to the list.
>
> The ARRAY() construct isn't really a function; it is a special
> syntax documented in Array Constructors,
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-expressions.html#SQL-SYNTAX-ARRAY-CONSTRUCTORS
>
> The addition you propose is misleading, because it would lead people
> to expect to find array() in the output of \df, for example. It
> might be reasonable to put in some kind of "see also"
> cross-reference in the array functions section, but we shouldn't
> list array() as though it were just like every other function in the
> section.
Good point.
Please find attached a different diff :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
array.diff | text/plain | 982 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-11-01 18:52:55 | Recent "make check" failure |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-01 03:40:47 | Re: Array function |