| From: | Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: curious delay on view/where |
| Date: | 2004-10-28 15:01:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200410281601.59009.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Thursday 28 October 2004 3:25 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > Anyone got any ideas of the cause, or thoughts on how I can trace
> > the problem?
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the fast and slow cases would be
> interesting. Also, have you ANALYZEd the underlying tables lately?
> And what PG version is this?
>
> regards, tom lane
Hi Tom.
I've the analyze but don't understand what it's telling me. I've made
it available at http://www.stainburn.com/analyze.txt
Gary
--
Gary Stainburn
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Murphy Pope | 2004-10-28 16:52:31 | Re: ORDER BY and NULLs |
| Previous Message | andre.toscano | 2004-10-28 14:53:25 | Re: extra info - curious delay on view/where |