Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website
Date: 2004-10-28 21:23:44
Message-ID: 200410281423.44511.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Alexey,

> Some of the hoops to jump through: pgsql-www list is not open for
> subscriptions. I didn't understand this back then and don't understand it
> now: if pgsql-hackers can be open, why pgsql-www can't?

It is open, now. We just discussed it last week, when Robert wanted to close
it.

> The moral of the story is obvious: we need an easily accessible page with
> info on how to contribute and info on current website development.

Well, Web Designer, you know what to do ...

Overall, though, it would make a big difference if one of the corporations
sponsoring PG decided to fund a part-time dedicated web developer.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Harrison 2004-10-28 21:59:28 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-10-28 21:13:23 Re: Community Relations WAS: PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Harrison 2004-10-28 21:59:28 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-10-28 21:13:23 Re: Community Relations WAS: PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal