From: | Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | plans and estimates for supporting JDBC 3.0 |
Date: | 2004-10-27 20:17:28 |
Message-ID: | 200410271617.28742@vadim.nasardinov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I'd like to ask for help in figuring out where the current
implementation stands with respect to JDBC 3.0 compliance, with a
particular emphasis on support for distributed transactions.
The current source tree contains about 35,200 lines of .java code [1],
of which 7,800 lines are in org/postgresql/test/. The latter number
breaks down as follows:
7,000 lines in org/postgresql/test/jdbc2/
260 lines in org/postgresql/test/jdbc3/
There seems to be a fair amount of code that has already been written to
support JDBC 3.0.
As far as I can tell, XADataSource, XAConnection, and XAResource have
not been implemented yet.
| $ find org/ -name \*.java | \
| xargs grep -E "XA(DataSource|Connection|Resource)" | wc -l
| 0
Is there a plan for doing this and an estimate of the required effort?
(As far as I understand, support for the XA stuff needs to be added on
the backend side. Ignoring that for a second, are there any estimates
for the amount of work required on the driver side?)
Thanks,
Vadim
Footnotes
1. http://people.redhat.com/~vadimn/scratch/pgsql-jdbc/file-stats.txt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vadim Nasardinov | 2004-10-27 20:23:44 | summary of new features in JDBC 3.0 |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-10-27 19:46:27 | Re: using 8 bit ascii |