Re: HP-UX PA-RISC/Itanium 64-bit Patch and HP-UX 11.23 Patch

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Shinji Teragaito <shinji(at)kobe(dot)hp(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: HP-UX PA-RISC/Itanium 64-bit Patch and HP-UX 11.23 Patch
Date: 2004-10-27 03:27:13
Message-ID: 200410262127.13832.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> > > Shinji Teragaito <shinji(at)kobe(dot)hp(dot)com> writes:
> > >> I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
> > >> HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform.

I see Shinji's patch changed the library suffix from .sl to .so for ia64.
Is that is necessary? If so, why?

Thanks,
Ed

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Barwick 2004-10-27 06:42:13 Re: 8.0b4: COMMIT outside of a transaction echoes ROLLBACK
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-10-27 03:23:11 pg_dump test success

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2004-10-27 04:02:30 pg_autovacuum vacuum cost variables patch v2
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2004-10-27 02:30:34 Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis