From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sequence question |
Date: | 2004-10-20 18:29:51 |
Message-ID: | 20041020182951.GE8721@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:52:59PM -0400, Eric E wrote:
> One thought I had, and I'd love to hear what people think of this, is to
> build a table of storage location numbers that are available for use.
> That way the search for new numbers could be pushed off until some
> convenient moment well after the user requests them.
That very application is how I heard the idea for the "second method"
I sent in another email. In the case I was thinking of, someone used
it for room allocation. It worked pretty well, as long as you can
tolerate occasional periods where you _do_ have gaps.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Close | 2004-10-20 18:34:13 | Re: how much ram do i give postgres? |
Previous Message | Eric E | 2004-10-20 17:52:59 | Re: Sequence question |