From: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: a bug in pg_dump? |
Date: | 2004-10-19 20:45:57 |
Message-ID: | 20041019204557.91675.qmail@web50005.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
--- Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> escribió:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:25:35PM -0400, Tom Lane
> wrote:
> > Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > > but when i do a: pg_dump -C uescc > uescc.sql
> > > it add the create statement for the database but
> not
> > > add appropiates alter database for the
> parameters i
> > > set search_path in this case.
> >
> > > But, pg_dumpall does.
> >
> > > a bug in pg_dump?
> >
> > No. That functionality is assigned to pg_dumpall.
Why in pg_dumpall and not in pg_dump -C?
>
> There doesn't seem to be a way of extracting only
> database creation from
> pg_dumpall. Or the schema of a single database, for
> example. There
> _is_ a functionality gap here.
>
>
> ISTM pg_dump -C (which dumps CREATE DATABASE) should
> dump ALTER DATABASE
> commands too.
It seems to be the logical behavior, IMHO.
best regards,
Jaime Casanova
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-19 21:23:43 | Re: BUG #1286: indices not used after a pg_restore |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-10-19 19:06:47 | Re: a bug in pg_dump? |