From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Pgsql-Admin(at)Postgresql(dot) Org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: NIC to NIC connection |
Date: | 2004-10-19 16:28:21 |
Message-ID: | 20041019162821.GJ3359@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:05:05PM -0400, Kent Anderson wrote:
> We are upgrading our servers and have run into an interesting situation. It
> has been proposed that we have a direct connection from the web servers to
> the postgres server via extra NICs.
> Before we even waste time installing the NIC's I would like a sense of how
> hard it is to get postgres to use that kind of a connection vs over the
> Internet.
I don't understand. What interface other than a NIC are you now
using to go "over the Internet"? Or do you mean that you want an
_extra_ IP address so that the web servers don't have to compete for
the bandwidth? In that case, sure, you'll probably get a minor
performance increase, depending on your current network traffic.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matt Clark | 2004-10-19 16:37:43 | Re: NIC to NIC connection |
Previous Message | Bryan Biggers | 2004-10-19 16:13:51 | pgsql database .1 .2 .3 file names |