| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: clustering |
| Date: | 2004-10-19 14:43:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20041019144322.GC3359@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 10:29:11AM +0530, Nageshwar Rao wrote:
> Hi,
> We would like use Postgresql as our database. For high availability is it
> possible to cluster DB in Postgresql. Appreciate if you can let me know how
> this can be achieved.
> Else is there any other way to achieve High Availability in POstgresql as
> this is mission critical system.
My recommendation for HA PostgreSQL is to use two servers with one of
those nifty HA options, and let the postmaster on the taking-over
machine recover the database just like after a crash. Also, you'll
be wanting to use slony (www.slony.info)
If you're asking whether Postgres has something akin to Oracle's RAC,
the answer is "not yet".
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Raffaele Spizzuoco | 2004-10-19 14:54:36 | OID and PK/FK KEYS |
| Previous Message | Taber, Mark | 2004-10-19 14:29:03 | " CLI describe error: Out of memory while reading tuples." |